Categories

    open all | close all

  • Users Online

    • 2 Users Online
  • Sponsored By:

      articleauthors.net

    Political Fiddling With Wildfires Burning And MRSA Killing

    Read more articles on Science and Technology and Life and Drugs.

    November 26, 2007

    Posted by neillevine

    neillevine
    About This Editor: I am a writer. Have been writing for other sites, but expect to do most of my future work HERE! My expertise extends from the esoteric such as burning hydrogen to the unpredictability of the stock market and my writing makes me a jack of all trades and exasperated master of none. I have had some influence over national wildfire and water policy and there are hints of a change in energy policy, BUT as Samuel Goldwyn once said, "A verbal promise is not worth the paper it is written on."

    419 Views

    Submit this article to the following social bookmark news sites:
    del.icio.us:Political Fiddling With Wildfires Burning And MRSA Killing digg:Political Fiddling With Wildfires Burning And MRSA Killing spurl:Political Fiddling With Wildfires Burning And MRSA Killing wists:Political Fiddling With Wildfires Burning And MRSA Killing furl:Political Fiddling With Wildfires Burning And MRSA Killing reddit:Political Fiddling With Wildfires Burning And MRSA Killing fark:Political Fiddling With Wildfires Burning And MRSA Killing blogmarks:Political Fiddling With Wildfires Burning And MRSA Killing Y!:Political Fiddling With Wildfires Burning And MRSA Killing smarking:Political Fiddling With Wildfires Burning And MRSA Killing

    The federal government is responsible for making policy in many areas from health care to the use of natural resources to fighting forest fires.

    The media, meaning newspapers, have been pointing out the dangers of MRSA, that is, methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus with eighty thousand new cases a year and twenty thousand deaths.

    Then there was a story about clostridium difficile, a bacterium that causes severe diarrhea and even death.  The point is that there is a need for new and more effective antibiotics.  Unfortunately, drug companies have been slow to discover new drugs in this category.  Research is expensive and drug trials take up a great deal of time.

    So proposals have been made by experienced and respected former government officials that in order to encourage the development of new anti-bacterial drugs they be given orphan drug status, a medical label designed to encourage research and development by protecting the investment made and expediting the legal use of new medicines on patients in need of treatment.  The companies involved get monopolistic protections and skip steps in the demanding drug testing required by the FDA.

    Since side effects of many medicines are often difficult to deal with and potentially very dangerous, with many problems arising unexpectedly and sometimes being overlooked due to the small number of people affected the one insightful thing I can add to this debate is that if favors are granted to encourage new drugs perhaps stricter and more detailed information on the impact of these medicines be required to offset the lower threshold of medical detail required, that is, fewer Phase I, II and III volunteers and tests.

    When I was looking into drug research the medicines that stood out were Tamiflu and Relenza.  I remember reading in the criticism of these drugs that a thirty percent reduction in symptoms was not much and that better drugs were on the way.  Well, several years later both of these medicines are considered to be successes and nothing much in the way of alternatives is currently available, although stricter warnings were just added to the labeling because of serious side effects reported in Japan.  Such are real world medical results for unpredictable medical research.

    Also, I would hope more could be done about bacterial pneumonia, which is also a big killer.

    Perhaps more thinking could be focused on wildfires, with another dangerous outbreak in Malibu, California making the news.  Let me ask if cloud seeding as in artificial rain making be practical and helpful.

    Finally, I believe the recent run up to ninety-eight dollars for a barrel of crude oil would underscore ineffectiveness of federal energy policy.  Hassling auto makers with greater fuel efficiency requirements diverts resources and still does not address the real problem.  Shell games impress political devotees but do not accomplish anything.  Why not solve the energy shortage NOW?  Shell games waste money and accomplish little.  .

    Last 5 Entries by neillevine

    Related Posts

  • About drug addiction treatment
  • More Wildfires, Higher Crude Oil Prices: Greater Tragedy
  • Apres Bernanke, Le Deluge Of Credit
  • The Constitution Is Very Clear
  • Mrs.Pelosi, Mme. Speaker, Collect The FICA Tax, End Energy Fraud
  • No comments yet. Be the first.

    Leave a reply

    You must be logged in to post a comment.